Ar
العربية

Rhetoric And Discourse In Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking In Judicial Decisions Paperback

نوصي
0 %
تقديرات المؤلفين
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
ترتيب حسب
تقييم
انشأ من قبل
Specifications
بلد المنشأ
India
الكاتب 1
Ryan Malphurs
وصف الكتاب
While legal scholars, psychologists, and political scientists commonly voice their skepticism over the influence oral arguments have on the Court's voting pattern, this book offers a contrarian position focused on close scrutiny of the justices' communication within oral arguments. Malphurs examines the rhetoric, discourse, and subsequent decision-making within the oral arguments for significant Supreme Court cases, visiting their potential power and danger and revealing the rich dynamic nature of the justices' interactions among themselves and the advocates. In addition to offering advancements in scholars' understanding of oral arguments, this study introduces Sensemaking as an alternative to rational decision-making in Supreme Court arguments, suggesting a new model of judicial decision-making to account for the communication within oral arguments that underscores a glaring irony surrounding the bulk of related research-the willingness of scholars to criticize oral arguments but their unwillingness to study this communication. With the growing accessibility of the Court's oral arguments and the inevitable introduction of television cameras in the courtroom, this book offers new theoretical and methodological perspectives at a time when scholars across the fields of communication, law, psychology, and political science will direct even greater attention and scrutiny toward the Supreme Court.
رقم الكتاب المعياري الدولي 10
1138842486
رقم الكتاب المعياري الدولي 13
9781138842489
اللغة
English
الناشر
Taylor & Francis Ltd
تاريخ النشر
13 Sep 2014
عن المؤلف
Ryan Malphurs earned a PhD in Communication from Texas A&M University, USA, and is a Senior Litigation Consultant for Courtroom Sciences, Inc.
المراجعة التحريرية
Malphurs's framing device - presenting his book as a letter to the Chief Justice - may seem like a gimmick. It's not. Rather, the "audience of one" evinces Malphurs's uncommon mission...Malphurs wants to improve oral arguments, to make oral argument a more effective tool for reaching better decisions.