The Constitutional Structure Of Europe's Area Of 'Freedom, Security And Justice' And The Right To Justification Hardcover

New

Ester Herlin-Karnell

This book explores the implications of freedom as a non-domination-oriented view for understanding EU security regulation and its constitutional implications. At a time when the European borders are under pressure and with the refugee and migration crisis, which escalated in 2015, the idea of exploring a constitutional theory for the 'Area of Freedom, Security and Justice' (AFSJ) might seem to be a utopian project. This appears especially true in the light of the increased threat of terrorism in Europe (and on a global scale) and where the expanding EU security agenda is often advanced through the administrative law path, in contrast to the constitutional trajectory. Add to this the prolonged financial crisis, which continues to cast a long shadow on the future development of EU integration, and which suggests that Europe needs to 're-invent itself' beyond the sphere of economics. Therefore, it is precisely because of the current uncertainties regarding the progress of the EU and the constitutional law project that a constitutional take on the AFSJ is of particular importance. The book investigates the meaning of non-domination and the idea of justice and justification in the area of EU security regulation. In doing so, it focuses on the development of an AFSJ, what it means, and why it represents a fascinating example of contemporary constitutional law with interacting layers of security regulation, human rights law and transnational legal theory at its core.

9781509912490

English

Bloomsbury Publishing Plc

18 Apr 2019

200

Ester Herlin-Karnell is Professor in EU Law, University Research Chair of EU Constitutional Law and Justice, and the Director of the VU Centre for European Legal Studies at the Free University of Amsterdam.

The analysis presented in the book provides more classic discussion points around the AFSJ with robust philosophical foundations. The conceptual richness of the volume sparks a number of follow-up questions that will be hopefully investigated in the future. This piece of scholarship fills a gap in the existing literature by offering a more systemic understanding of the functioning of the AFSJ, and offers an original angle to assess long-standing questions of constitutional relevance. -- Leandro Mancano * Common Market Law Review *